Managed Staffing vs.
Traditional Recruitment
Why modern engineering teams are shifting from direct hiring to operational ownership. A transparent breakdown of cost, risk, and speed.
- 2-4 week rapid deployment (vs 3-6 months)
- Zero upfront recruitment fees or retainers
- Fully managed HR, legal, and operational infrastructure
Trusted by high-growth companies
The "Hidden Cost" of Traditional Hiring
Most companies only look at salaries when comparing hiring options. But the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) includes recruitment fees, equipment, benefits, management overhead, and the massive risk of bad hires.
Traditional Recruitment Risks
- 3-6 months average time-to-hire
- 20-30% recruitment agency fees (upfront)
- High risk of turnover & bad cultural fit
- You manage HR, payroll, & legal liability
GBF Managed Staffing
- 2-4 weeks deployment (Fast Track)
- Zero upfront recruitment fees
- Free replacement guarantee
- We handle HR, Payroll, Legal & Equipment
Head-to-Head Comparison
A transparent look at how our "Operational Ownership" model stacks up against traditional options.
| Comparison Factor | Traditional Recruitment | GBF Managed Staffing |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Deployment | 3-6 Months | 2-4 Weeks |
| Recruitment Fees | 20-30% of Annual Salary | $0 Upfront Fees |
| Equipment & Setup | $2,500 - $4,000 per head | Included |
| HR & Payroll Admin | Internal HR Burden | Fully Managed by GBF |
| Bad Hire Risk | Cost Sunk ($20k+) | Free Replacement |
| Long-term Retention | Employee Attrition Risk | Structured Retention Programs |
| Engineering Cost | 100% Market Rate | Determine by You (Budget Optimized) |
Ready to Optimize Your Engineering Budget?
Get matched with developers within 4 hours
No upfront commitment
Fully managed setup
Start your team
Estimate your cost first? Calculate savings