40% More Engineering Capacity
Strategic Comparison
Managed Staffing vs.
Traditional Recruitment
Why modern engineering teams are shifting from direct hiring to operational ownership. A transparent breakdown of cost, risk, and speed.
The "Hidden Cost" of Traditional Hiring
Most companies only look at salaries when comparing hiring options. But the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) includes recruitment fees, equipment, benefits, management overhead, and the massive risk of bad hires.
Traditional Recruitment Risks
- •3-6 months average time-to-hire
- •20-30% recruitment agency fees (upfront)
- •High risk of turnover & bad cultural fit
- •You manage HR, payroll, & legal liability
GBF Managed Staffing
- •2-4 weeks deployment (Fast Track)
- •Zero upfront recruitment fees
- •Free replacement guarantee
- •We handle HR, Payroll, Legal & Equipment
Head-to-Head Comparison
A transparent look at how our "Operational Ownership" model stacks up against traditional options.
| Comparison Factor | Traditional Recruitment | GBF Managed Staffing |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Deployment | 3-6 Months | 2-4 Weeks |
| Recruitment Fees | 20-30% of Annual Salary | $0 Upfront Fees |
| Equipment & Setup | $2,500 - $4,000 per head | Included |
| HR & Payroll Admin | Internal HR Burden | Fully Managed by GBF |
| Bad Hire Risk | Cost Sunk ($20k+) | Free Replacement |
| Long-term Retention | Employee Attrition Risk | Structured Retention Programs |
| Engineering Cost | 100% Market Rate | Determine by You (Budget Optimized) |
Ready to Optimize Your Engineering Budget?
Discover how our remote software development services can transform your business. Let's discuss your needs and find the perfect solution!
Let’s TalkNo Upfront Commitment.
Free Consultation to Get Started.
Quality-Guaranteed Developers.